In regards to Reviewing! (Topic)

Staredit Network > Forums > Staredit Network > Topic: In regards to Reviewing!

In regards to Reviewing!

Jan 16 2009, 9:31 pm
By: lSHaDoW-FoXl

Polls

Should Reviewing be brought back to StarEdit.net?

Answer	Votes	Percentage	%	Voters
Yeah! Of course! It should be open for all SEN Users.	9		53%	None.
Yes, but only for those that are skilled.	5		30%	None.
No, just let it die already.	1		6%	None.
Honestly, I don't care (Why are you in this poll then?)	2		12%	None.

Please login to vote.
Poll has 17 votes. You can vote for at most 1 option(s).

Jan 16 2009, 9:31 pm lSHaDoW-FoXl Post #1

'Aight firstly a time ago some of you are aware I made a topic asking why we cannot write reviews, some people came up with quite nice solutions. (Me included, heheh) and I decided to make a poll in regards to the entire situation! :3

Whom here believes reviewing should be open for all?
Whom thinks it should be granted to those that proves them self worthy?
Whom thinks it's just a lost cause, and that it should die?

Either way please share your opinion and hopefully we can bring back reviewing in Staredit.net! n_n

None.

Jan 16 2009, 9:34 pm lSHaDoW-FoXl Post #2

Oops, I forgot to state my reason.

I my self voted ''Only those that prove them self skilled.'' because clearly, if everyone clutters up Staredit.net with reviews that are not needed and that contribute absolutely nothing then reviews are nothing but a nuisance. Meanwhile, my idea is good because those that prove them self, those that truly can dedicate their time to writing reviews for this site can be able to do so, and without annoying pests who have nothing better to do then write something a five year old could.

Does anyone else have any ideas or opinions of this matter?

None.

Jan 16 2009, 9:39 pm

ClansAreForGays Post #3

Where's the option where we can vote for "wtf? We already have reviews http://www.staredit.net/?p=reviews"

I think what you're asking for is to change the way reviews work.

http://waitbutwhy.com/2013/09/why-generation-y-yuppies-are-unhappy.html
"We're being taught to hate downwards"

Jan 16 2009, 9:45 pm lSHaDoW-FoXl Post #4

Everytime I try that I get this message that says.

"A Staredit Network error has occured:
GET variable value invalid. Problem v = reviews"
Please contact administration with all the details."

=(

None.

Jan 16 2009, 9:59 pm

Moose Post #5

meme

That's because CAFG made a bad link which included the quotation mark.
http://www.staredit.net/?p=reviews
It's accessible from the navigation at the top.

None.

Jan 16 2009, 10:08 pm lSHaDoW-FoXl Post #6

If you mean that part where it says "Write" I tried it v.v.

I write down the file name and I still get that horrid message that strikes fear into my soul T.T

None.

Jan 16 2009, 10:12 pm

Moose Post #7

meme

File name? You're supposed to input the numerical ID that corresponds to file in the DLDB that you're reviewing.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Jan 16 2009, 10:32 pm by Mini Moose 2707. Reason: spelling

Jan 16 2009, 10:22 pm lSHaDoW-FoXl Post #8

"numberical ID"

My god! Almighty moose! You might have uncovered what I didn't O_O.

Please do explain furthermore! :3! <3 You're my hero =D

ooh and it's an honor to have your awesomeness in my poll/thread/topic.

None.

Jan 16 2009, 10:46 pm lSHaDoW-FoXl Post #9

Soo..How do I find out the numberical ID of the map I want to review?

None.

Jan 16 2009, 10:54 pm

Falkoner Post #10

It's in the URL of the page where it's displayed.

None.

Jan 16 2009, 10:55 pm

Symmetry Post #11

Dungeon Master

Also, there's an edit button for a reason...

Options

Pages: 1

Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.

Global Shoutbox

[06:10 pm]

Ultraviolet -- sweet summer child

[2026-6-26. : 10:31 am]

NudeRaider -- blessed innocent soul knows nothing of the strife we had before EUDs were discovered :teehee:

[2026-6-23. : 3:29 am]

DarkenedFantasies -- Probably just didn't care. For example, at some point before release, they've updated the graphics of some of the Protoss buildings (Forge, CyberCore, Citadel, Observatory, Arbiter Tribunal), but instead of properly re-rendering them with edited 3D models, they did crappy copy-paste jobs on the rendered graphics.

[2026-6-22. : 8:35 pm]

Ultraviolet -- :wob:

[2026-6-21. : 11:38 pm]

Symmetry -- :wob:

[2026-6-21. : 4:56 am]

Ultraviolet -- I suppose we'll likely never know, but my guess would be that they already saw it operating successfully and there was no monetary incentive to finish the original work. And the dev cycle in old school Blizzard was so hectic, it's possible it just got forgotten about after the original game got released. Plus there's an element of existing MPQ files that were packaged with the original discs becoming outdated if they updated it. And it's not like they remade the original MPQs, they just made new ones for BW specifically

[2026-6-21. : 4:26 am]

Oh_Man -- so that makes me think maybe the theory they are unfinished is not true and its a deliberate design decision, coz why not finish them wen ur making brood war?

[2026-6-21. : 4:25 am]

Oh_Man -- the thing is thos buildings are from classic. that means they went ahead and made brood war without ever finishing the 'unfinished' buildings

[2026-6-20. : 6:15 pm]

Ultraviolet -- Yeah he's talked about a lot of that stuff in his casts before. It seems plausible. Especially knowing how Blizzard of yesteryear operated.

[2026-6-20. : 3:47 pm]

NudeRaider -- to clarify: couldn't recall the behavior for every single Protoss building but I was aware the disparity exists.

Please log in to shout.

Members Online:

l)ark_ssj9kevin