Compiling under Windows for Mac (Topic)

Staredit Network > Forums > Technology & Computers > Topic: Compiling under Windows for Mac

Compiling under Windows for Mac

Dec 31 2008, 2:59 pm
By: Elvang

Pages: 1

Dec 31 2008, 2:59 pm Elvang Post #1

How would I go about compiling a C++ program under Windows(or Ubuntu if need be) for a Mac? I use Code::Blocks if it matters at all.

None.

Jan 4 2009, 6:57 pm Kellimus Post #2

Uh, any C++ compiler should work, you just need to know how to program FOR a Mac..

None.

Jan 4 2009, 7:43 pm

Falkoner Post #3

Quote

Uh, any C++ compiler should work, you just need to know how to program FOR a Mac..

What? Kellimus, plz leave

The only thing correct about what you said is that system specific commands will not work for the Mac.
Google is your friend: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=180022

None.

Jan 4 2009, 8:18 pm

scwizard Post #4

Quote from Elvang

How would I go about compiling a C++ program under Windows(or Ubuntu if need be) for a Mac? I use Code::Blocks if it matters at all.

I don't know. Also this isn't a very desirable thing. If you plan on developing for multiple platforms it's really best to get some kind of access to those platforms to do testing.

None.

Jan 5 2009, 6:07 am

Syphon Post #5

You could always run the platforms in a Platform virtualiser like VMware.

None.

Jan 6 2009, 4:15 am Kellimus Post #6

Quote from

Falkoner

Quote

Uh, any C++ compiler should work, you just need to know how to program FOR a Mac..

What? Kellimus, plz leave

The only thing correct about what you said is that system specific commands will not work for the Mac.
Google is your friend: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=180022

I misread what he said

None.

Options

Pages: 1

Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.

Global Shoutbox

[10:13 pm]

Oh_Man -- No APM in chess. Computer just outthinks the human by seeing more moves ahead and more permutations

[10:12 pm]

Oh_Man -- U reckon? Kasparov waa defeated by computer decades ago

[05:47 pm]

NimoStar -- If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface

[05:34 pm]

NimoStar -- Well. The bot didn't come up with any new strategy. It just has superhuman micro. Hard to beat that. I reckon even the simplest dedicated chess engines are unbeatable for humans now.

[02:13 pm]

Oh_Man -- all g

[10:54 am]

NudeRaider -- Oh_Man

Oh_Man shouted: NudeRaider did u watch the entire video? it's not one game. it's currently dominating the ladder at number 1 position. do ur research first!

Oops, caught me there, no I haven't.

I was imagining how the game went. Sorry for that. Watching it now. brb

[10:52 am]

NudeRaider -- NimoStar

NimoStar shouted: They were not "Unprepared" that was their fifth loss in a row against the bot. The other replays are also available

that doesn't mean he was prepared. When humans come around with new strategies it often takes weeks until the pros figure out how to shut it down. Oh_Man

Oh_Man shouted: https://youtu.be/GiQ-cDtsZYw

that's certainly a way more convincing argument for micro being "too good to beat".

[09:43 am]

DiearAnother -- wirefram

[08:35 am]

NimoStar -- Well, pros showed that long ago... half of zerg pros just ling muta rush

[08:35 am]

NimoStar -- " its shown is that you can trade 1000's of apm to make up for lack of strategy"

Please log in to shout.

Members Online:

O)FaRTy1billion[MM],

Oh_Man