I need to split coaxial 4 ways and interference is a problem for a tv atm. I'm mostly worried about the noise something like this would introduce. Is that something minor for the internets?
None.
Coaxial cable + amps
Does anyone know coaxial cable / signals well enough to tell me if something like http://www.amazon.com/Bi-Directional-Amplifier-Splitter-Booster-Passive/dp/B000WDR94U would help or hinder internet broadband?
I need to split coaxial 4 ways and interference is a problem for a tv atm. I'm mostly worried about the noise something like this would introduce. Is that something minor for the internets?
I need to split coaxial 4 ways and interference is a problem for a tv atm. I'm mostly worried about the noise something like this would introduce. Is that something minor for the internets?
I have one. It didn't hurt my internet connection at all, but it's only connected to the TV atm. If you need one, you should call your cable company and complain more instead of getting one. It [i|is[/i| their fault your connectivity is bad.
None.
I think it's more of the choice of cables used by the tv system and the splitting and the mesh of wires in the area. It uses coaxial, split twice, to cable box, coaxial to dvd, and then coaxial to tv. I'm not sure what jacks the tv has (it's older), but I'll upgrade it to whatever I can, at best, s video.
I have a love for wires/cables, and plan on getting high precision coaxial for the start of this little network and for the cables going into my room. Everyone else might get slightly better than basic cables. My only desire for the amp is to counter the dB loss in splitting the wire multiple times, not so much for the actual amplification.
I have a love for wires/cables, and plan on getting high precision coaxial for the start of this little network and for the cables going into my room. Everyone else might get slightly better than basic cables. My only desire for the amp is to counter the dB loss in splitting the wire multiple times, not so much for the actual amplification.
None.
Quote from name:isolatedpurity
I think it's more of the choice of cables used by the tv system and the splitting and the mesh of wires in the area. It uses coaxial, split twice, to cable box, coaxial to dvd, and then coaxial to tv. I'm not sure what jacks the tv has (it's older), but I'll upgrade it to whatever I can, at best, s video.
I have a love for wires/cables, and plan on getting high precision coaxial for the start of this little network and for the cables going into my room. Everyone else might get slightly better than basic cables. My only desire for the amp is to counter the dB loss in splitting the wire multiple times, not so much for the actual amplification.
I have a love for wires/cables, and plan on getting high precision coaxial for the start of this little network and for the cables going into my room. Everyone else might get slightly better than basic cables. My only desire for the amp is to counter the dB loss in splitting the wire multiple times, not so much for the actual amplification.
Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on Dec 23 2008, 2:26 am by Doodle77.
None.
Quote from name:isolatedpurity
I think it's more of the choice of cables used by the tv system and the splitting and the mesh of wires in the area. It uses coaxial, split twice, to cable box, coaxial to dvd, and then coaxial to tv. I'm not sure what jacks the tv has (it's older), but I'll upgrade it to whatever I can, at best, s video.
I have a love for wires/cables, and plan on getting high precision coaxial for the start of this little network and for the cables going into my room. Everyone else might get slightly better than basic cables. My only desire for the amp is to counter the dB loss in splitting the wire multiple times, not so much for the actual amplification.
I have a love for wires/cables, and plan on getting high precision coaxial for the start of this little network and for the cables going into my room. Everyone else might get slightly better than basic cables. My only desire for the amp is to counter the dB loss in splitting the wire multiple times, not so much for the actual amplification.
I bet your main problem lies within them splitting your signal.........Twice.
None.
Options
Pages: 1
Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[10:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- No APM in chess. Computer just outthinks the human by seeing more moves ahead and more permutations[05:47 pm]
NimoStar -- If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface[05:34 pm]
NimoStar -- Well. The bot didn't come up with any new strategy. It just has superhuman micro. Hard to beat that. I reckon even the simplest dedicated chess engines are unbeatable for humans now.[10:54 am]
NudeRaider -- Oh_ManOh_Man shouted: NudeRaider did u watch the entire video? it's not one game. it's currently dominating the ladder at number 1 position. do ur research first!
Oops, caught me there, no I haven't. 
I was imagining how the game went. Sorry for that. Watching it now. brb[10:52 am]
NudeRaider -- NimoStarNimoStar shouted: They were not "Unprepared" that was their fifth loss in a row against the bot. The other replays are also available
that doesn't mean he was prepared. When humans come around with new strategies it often takes weeks until the pros figure out how to shut it down. Oh_ManOh_Man shouted: https://youtu.be/GiQ-cDtsZYw
that's certainly a way more convincing argument for micro being "too good to beat".[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- " its shown is that you can trade 1000's of apm to make up for lack of strategy"
Members Online: 
O)FaRTy1billion[MM], Oh_Man
O)FaRTy1billion[MM], Oh_Man