Awesome
Jul 17 2008, 5:28 am
By: omginbd  

Jul 17 2008, 5:28 am omginbd Post #1





Yes. Not on purpose. I was copying the Spybot - Search and Destroy installation file and that happened. GO VISTA!!!



None.

Jul 17 2008, 7:02 am cheeze Post #2



That's just because your harddrive sucks. Not because of Vista.



None.

Jul 17 2008, 9:49 am The Great Yam Post #3



Can we ever blame Vista? Oh my, impervious Vista, who gives us wine and bread from the sky, manna from the heavens and water from the rocks!

We shall sign a covenant in thy name and we shall consecrate our sons to you, o'Vista, righteous and mighty!

Up your and Bill Gate's ass.

I don't know how Windows actually decides how long something is going to take, but 80% of the time it's dead wrong. By the time it pinpoints how long an installation/download will take it's usually over anyways.

I have serious doubts it would take that long on a computer that could even run that CPU-sucking POS.



None.

Jul 17 2008, 3:43 pm Falkoner Post #4



Yeah, Window's time remaining is always wrong, I have a Mac and it pinpoints it very quickly, I mean, I'll have a DVD being encoded, and it'll get a pretty close time 1-2 minutes after I start, for something that takes 5 hours or more.



None.

Jul 17 2008, 7:39 pm Atlos Post #5



That's because either your harddrive write speed sucks horribly or you haven't waited for it to go down. It always starts longer than it'll take for me and then makes its way closer to the actual time.



None.

Jul 17 2008, 8:26 pm Hug A Zergling Post #6



You shouldn't be mean to vista :(
Maybe its just computer, and not operating system? and even if you do think its vista, why not just get XP if its so bad?



None.

Jul 17 2008, 11:20 pm Vi3t-X Post #7



Remember; it said ABOUT 44859 Days and 18 hours. You may not have to wait that long! :lol:

But seriously, your harddrive must suck really bad. Whats the write speed on it?
(Or is it possibly beacuse Vista's operating costs are considerably higher than that of XP?)



None.

Jul 18 2008, 1:09 am dumbducky Post #8



http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/bb738089.aspx
Should fix it.



tits

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[05:47 pm]
NimoStar -- If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface
[05:34 pm]
NimoStar -- Well. The bot didn't come up with any new strategy. It just has superhuman micro. Hard to beat that. I reckon even the simplest dedicated chess engines are unbeatable for humans now.
[02:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- all g
[10:54 am]
NudeRaider -- Oh_Man
Oh_Man shouted: NudeRaider did u watch the entire video? it's not one game. it's currently dominating the ladder at number 1 position. do ur research first!
Oops, caught me there, no I haven't. :( I was imagining how the game went. Sorry for that. Watching it now. brb
[10:52 am]
NudeRaider -- NimoStar
NimoStar shouted: They were not "Unprepared" that was their fifth loss in a row against the bot. The other replays are also available
that doesn't mean he was prepared. When humans come around with new strategies it often takes weeks until the pros figure out how to shut it down. Oh_Man that's certainly a way more convincing argument for micro being "too good to beat".
[09:43 am]
DiearAnother -- wirefram
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- Well, pros showed that long ago... half of zerg pros just ling muta rush
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- " its shown is that you can trade 1000's of apm to make up for lack of strategy"
[03:25 am]
Oh_Man -- https://youtu.be/R_6bsf9REkY anyone ever tried playing SC ghost?
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: NimoStar