Staredit Network > Forums > Technology & Computers > Topic: Digital Camera
Digital Camera
May 5 2008, 12:11 am
By: Moose  

May 5 2008, 12:11 am Moose Post #1

Armor: 90.50%

I figured it's about time that I actually own a digital camera. I'm not looking for anything fancy, but considering this will be my first, I don't know much about them. So, I turn to you guys for advice. I don't know how many fancy megapixels and such I need. Movie capabilities would be nice, but if I develop Hollywood ambitions, I'll get a better one when the time comes. I don't need the crazy sepia, black and white, etc functions... that's what my computer is for. :P (Though I guess a lot of this stuff is standard these days.)
My price range is $200 or less.
So, let me know what basic specs and other things I should be looking for.




May 5 2008, 12:16 am MasterJohnny Post #2



This is over your price but I always wanted this camera
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16830144121 because the lens thingy doesnt stick out.
uhh...I guess look for cameras with autofocus



I am a Mathematician Computer Scientist Logic user Person who does not need to use AI

May 5 2008, 1:14 pm ShadowFlare Post #3



Well, if you are going for image quality, there are various aspects of it to consider. Some things that have an effect on image quality, other than the resolution, are the lens quality, the quality of the sensor, and the size of the sensor. A low quality lens might give you somewhat noticeable purple edges on some things, for example.

I'd say look for some sites with camera reviews so you can see what is good and what isn't so good (they often give some sample photos in their reviews).



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[05:47 pm]
NimoStar -- If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface
[05:34 pm]
NimoStar -- Well. The bot didn't come up with any new strategy. It just has superhuman micro. Hard to beat that. I reckon even the simplest dedicated chess engines are unbeatable for humans now.
[02:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- all g
[10:54 am]
NudeRaider -- Oh_Man
Oh_Man shouted: NudeRaider did u watch the entire video? it's not one game. it's currently dominating the ladder at number 1 position. do ur research first!
Oops, caught me there, no I haven't. :( I was imagining how the game went. Sorry for that. Watching it now. brb
[10:52 am]
NudeRaider -- NimoStar
NimoStar shouted: They were not "Unprepared" that was their fifth loss in a row against the bot. The other replays are also available
that doesn't mean he was prepared. When humans come around with new strategies it often takes weeks until the pros figure out how to shut it down. Oh_Man that's certainly a way more convincing argument for micro being "too good to beat".
[09:43 am]
DiearAnother -- wirefram
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- Well, pros showed that long ago... half of zerg pros just ling muta rush
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- " its shown is that you can trade 1000's of apm to make up for lack of strategy"
[03:25 am]
Oh_Man -- https://youtu.be/R_6bsf9REkY anyone ever tried playing SC ghost?
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: MobMob