Staredit Network > Forums > Staredit Network > Topic: Something I miss
Something I miss
May 4 2008, 8:59 pm
By: Symmetry  

May 4 2008, 8:59 pm Symmetry Post #1

Dungeon Master

Currently, when you press the 'img' button to insert the image bbcode, a little popup appears. I liked it when you could highlight a link, press image and the tags would appear around it. Can we have this back? (If you don't know what I mean, highlight some text and press the bold text button.)



:voy: :jaff: :voy: :jaff:

May 4 2008, 9:09 pm Doodan Post #2



Yesh, I agree



None.

May 4 2008, 9:31 pm Brontobyte Post #3



What are you supposed to input in that box? The location of the image in your computer?



None.

May 4 2008, 9:38 pm mikelat Post #4



Thats the way IP likes his bbcode, personally I like lack of javascript popups.

I personally hope to eventually have a "standard" and "expert" bbtag modes with my latova where the expert mode just prints out the bbtags and lets you fill in the information while the standard mode makes ajax popups guiding you through the information. Both modes however if you had text selected would just incase the content in question with the bbtags.

Maybe IP would like to implement something similar some day, but I think it'd be a definite improvement.

We could also look into a WYSIWYG editor but I've never personally liked those, it feels unnatural to me. I maybe just like looking at bbtags more.



None.

May 4 2008, 9:40 pm Symmetry Post #5

Dungeon Master

Warboards uses a wysiwyg system, I really don't like it. It also works with standard tags though, so I just use those.



:voy: :jaff: :voy: :jaff:

May 4 2008, 9:51 pm Syphon Post #6



While we're on post customisation, could you guys add MathML or LaTeX support? We often get into mathy debates, and I <3 having my posts look proper.



None.

May 5 2008, 2:31 am DT_Battlekruser Post #7



Haha, Syphon has a point, but I tend to get by with abusing charmap :P

I agree though that WYSIWYG is pretty ugly. It feels too much like word processing :|




None.

May 5 2008, 7:17 am mikelat Post #8



Quote from DT_Battlekruser
Haha, Syphon has a point, but I tend to get by with abusing charmap :P

I agree though that WYSIWYG is pretty ugly. It feels too much like word processing :|
For the sake of me possibly brainstorming a better way of doing WYSIWYG, what exactly do you dislike about it and how do you think it can be improved?



None.

May 5 2008, 2:27 pm DT_Battlekruser Post #9



I guess I just dislike having to click heavily around what essentially feels like an application within a browser. I tend to be able to get much better formatting results when I can insert tags manually than when I have to use things like the bold button. That and most WYSIWYG editors have the disturbing dichotomy of needed to click on formatting buttons but not supporting the standard control shortcuts (cntl+b, cntl+i, etc.). Gmail would definitely be my favorite of the WYSIWYG editors I've seen.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[02:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[2026-9-11. : 1:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[2026-9-10. : 5:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[2026-9-10. : 5:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[2026-9-10. : 5:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: O)FaRTy1billion[MM], Dem0n, RIVE