Staredit Network > Forums > Technology & Computers > Topic: Windows Remote Desktop Connection
Windows Remote Desktop Connection
Apr 6 2008, 5:35 am
By: omginbd  

Apr 6 2008, 5:35 am omginbd Post #1



Okay, so I just recently discovered RDC. I can get it to work on my network, but there really is no point unless you can access it from somewhere else right??? So, I setup IIS on both computers, and the "http://localhost/ test works, but when I try to connect to my other comp from IE it says:

Go here because Tripod is retarded

Help me?



None.

Apr 6 2008, 4:19 pm dumbducky Post #2



I'm pretty sure XP just has Remote Desktop Assistance, which is different.



tits

Apr 6 2008, 5:29 pm omginbd Post #3



No, I can connect to the other computer with "REMOTE DESKTOP CONNECTION".



None.

Apr 6 2008, 6:30 pm cheeze Post #4



use something less lame. like VNC.



None.

Apr 7 2008, 7:57 am ShadowFlare Post #5



The simplest way would be to forward port 3389, if you are connected to the internet through a router (which you likely are, since you implied you have multiple computers). I don't know if I'd recommend directly forwarding port 3389, though, as remote desktop may or may not be a secure protocol. If you are willing to take that risk, this will most likely be the easiest way to get it working if you need/want to be able to connect to it from any computer.

An alternative would be to tunnel it through some other protocol, like SSH or some kind of VPN software (like Hamachi, for example). If you will always be connecting from a certain computer, like a laptop computer you own, for example, Hamachi would probably be the way to go, since it would be the easiest way to get it working (no port forwarding, no dynamic DNS needed if you have a dynamic IP address) and it would keep it more secure. Connecting from a computer you own and control is of course the safest way, since you never know if someone has installed a key logger, etc. on a public computer you are using.

And a side note about VNC; it was never designed to be used over the internet, so it is often at least somewhat slower and it is definitely less secure (no password encryption or encryption of any data at all, limited supported password length, and probably other things I've heard of that I can't recall at the moment).

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Apr 7 2008, 8:06 am by ShadowFlare.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[05:47 pm]
NimoStar -- If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface
[05:34 pm]
NimoStar -- Well. The bot didn't come up with any new strategy. It just has superhuman micro. Hard to beat that. I reckon even the simplest dedicated chess engines are unbeatable for humans now.
[02:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- all g
[10:54 am]
NudeRaider -- Oh_Man
Oh_Man shouted: NudeRaider did u watch the entire video? it's not one game. it's currently dominating the ladder at number 1 position. do ur research first!
Oops, caught me there, no I haven't. :( I was imagining how the game went. Sorry for that. Watching it now. brb
[10:52 am]
NudeRaider -- NimoStar
NimoStar shouted: They were not "Unprepared" that was their fifth loss in a row against the bot. The other replays are also available
that doesn't mean he was prepared. When humans come around with new strategies it often takes weeks until the pros figure out how to shut it down. Oh_Man that's certainly a way more convincing argument for micro being "too good to beat".
[09:43 am]
DiearAnother -- wirefram
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- Well, pros showed that long ago... half of zerg pros just ling muta rush
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- " its shown is that you can trade 1000's of apm to make up for lack of strategy"
[03:25 am]
Oh_Man -- https://youtu.be/R_6bsf9REkY anyone ever tried playing SC ghost?
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: MobMob