Staredit Network > Forums > Null > Topic: Picture Game
Picture Game
This topic is locked. You can no longer write replies here.
Mar 26 2008, 9:16 pm
By: KrayZee  

Mar 27 2008, 3:16 pm candle12345 Post #21



Damn straight.



None.

Mar 27 2008, 3:17 pm JordanN Post #22



Quote from Yoshi
This game sucks because it appears like each person is making a completely new picture instead of editing the old one.

The game sucked since the beginning it was started.



None.

Mar 27 2008, 3:18 pm candle12345 Post #23



Only coz you got stomped.



None.

Mar 27 2008, 3:19 pm KrayZee Post #24



Quote from Yoshi
This game sucks because it appears like each person is making a completely new picture instead of editing the old one.
Blame l)ark, I can easily put a rule up about that.



None.

Mar 27 2008, 3:22 pm MadZombie Post #25



it sucked the second you said no photoshop >:l

and use a bigger resolution next time? maybe that well let people have the space to add stuff then edit things.(got crowded after like the 5th person or something :\ )



None.

Mar 27 2008, 3:23 pm HolySin Post #26



Let's start on a fresh sheet of paper.
[attach=767]

Attachments:
Paper.PNG
Hits: 0 Size: 9.67kb



None.

Mar 27 2008, 3:24 pm candle12345 Post #27



The red X.
IT BURNS US



None.

Mar 27 2008, 3:26 pm MadZombie Post #28



its a giant peice of paper :P

id play along, But i refuse to use paint :'( why cant we use photoshop? D:



None.

Mar 27 2008, 3:35 pm candle12345 Post #29




Paint only sucks in the wrong hands.



None.

Mar 27 2008, 3:38 pm KrayZee Post #30



Quote from MadZombie
it sucked the second you said no photoshop >:l

and use a bigger resolution next time? maybe that well let people have the space to add stuff then edit things.(got crowded after like the 5th person or something :\ )
Photoshop IS allowed, as long if there is no sign of Photoshop-made appearance. Since IP, FlyingHat already used Photoshop, I'll just allow photoshop...

Okay, it's set up to 1280 x 1024. Remember to put it in '.png' to save memory and best quality.

And continue with this one, I just expanded it.

New Rule:
5. Don't change the environment either grass or sky. Leave it be for now.


***THE PICTURE*** to continue with:


Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Mar 28 2008, 7:35 am by isolatedpurity.



None.

Mar 27 2008, 3:41 pm candle12345 Post #31



That picture sucks.
And you broke the rule:
'Only the latest picture'



None.

Mar 27 2008, 3:45 pm KrayZee Post #32



Quote from candle12345
That picture sucks.
And you broke the rule:
'Only the latest picture'
Read what I said before making conclusions.



None.

Mar 27 2008, 3:46 pm candle12345 Post #33



I'm just being a pain, don't mind me.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[09:16 am]
NimoStar -- ever wanted to play melee in installation tileset? Now you can https://staredit.net/topic/18929/
[02:29 am]
Symmetry -- TFW you google a problem and find the answer in a post you made yourself
[01:46 am]
Oh_Man -- How can i change my name here to put [TFE] on the end will thr website let me
[2026-9-10. : 6:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"
[2026-9-10. : 5:48 pm]
Zoan -- ppl do it all the time in PDEs
[2026-9-10. : 5:47 pm]
Zoan -- Heinermann
Heinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative
[2026-9-10. : 5:44 pm]
NudeRaider -- I only heard about it, didn't any news article, so what did it do then?
[2026-9-10. : 5:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
[2026-9-10. : 5:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal ;)
[2026-9-10. : 5:32 pm]
Zoan -- Navier Stokes is not that esoteric I thought
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: O)FaRTy1billion[MM]