None.
change vulture grenade explosion?
How do i change the animation/sprites of the vulture's grenade explosion? does it use jpg or png images?
In Iscript, the vulture grenade explosion is entry 440 in Images.
The image format is .grp, but I don't know much about image editing.
Just...if you use .jpg, you will be cursed👻👻.
The image format is .grp, but I don't know much about image editing.
Just...if you use .jpg, you will be cursed👻👻.
The Curious
The SC sprites are .grp (1.16.1) or .anim (1.18 onward) files. Both are convertable to the mundane file formats (.bmp or .png) respectively using PYGRP - found in the same PYMS suite that you are apparently using - or Animosity. The latter utility has a thread (with download links) here: http://www.staredit.net/topic/17590/
If all you need is changing not the image itself but the way it works, yeah, Iscript is the thing to go for.
If all you need is changing not the image itself but the way it works, yeah, Iscript is the thing to go for.
Trial and error... mostly error.
Quote from IlyaSnopchenko
The SC sprites are .grp (1.16.1) or .anim (1.18 onward) files. Both are convertable to the mundane file formats (.bmp or .png) respectively using PYGRP - found in the same PYMS suite that you are apparently using - or Animosity. The latter utility has a thread (with download links) here: http://www.staredit.net/topic/17590/
If all you need is changing not the image itself but the way it works, yeah, Iscript is the thing to go for.
If all you need is changing not the image itself but the way it works, yeah, Iscript is the thing to go for.
I opened a few .grp with PYGRP, Animosity cant open them even though it has the option to. I want to replace the image of the explosion, i dont know where the original image is located tho. I looked inside broodwar.mpq, starcraft.mpq, broodat.mpq, patch_rt.mpq.
None.
Roy's Secret Service
It's in StarDat.mpq, unit\thingy\efgHit.grp
Options
Pages: 1
Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- HeinermannHeinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal 
[04:32 pm]
NudeRaider -- ZoanZoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?