Staredit Network > Forums > Technology & Computers > Topic: Memory Timings
Memory Timings
Jan 24 2008, 10:52 pm
By: Nintendo_Confed  

Jan 24 2008, 10:52 pm Nintendo_Confed Post #1



I guess the title says it all.



None.

Jan 24 2008, 11:12 pm MrrLL Post #2



Google'd, hope this helps.
http://www.cooltechzone.com/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=377&Itemid=0



None.

Jan 24 2008, 11:29 pm Nintendo_Confed Post #3



Sorry, didnt help much... I need someone like deathhawk or felagund to explain it for me..



None.

Jan 25 2008, 1:48 am ~:Deathawk:~ Post #4



Latencies are just basically how many cycles it takes the memory to perform a certain operation.



None.

Jan 25 2008, 2:24 am Nintendo_Confed Post #5



I was looking for a more complete answer, I need a pretty good idea of what it is, what its for and how it works.



None.

Jan 27 2008, 3:59 am dumbducky Post #6



Basically, the reaction time for the RAM.



tits

Jan 28 2008, 3:28 pm Sael Post #7



If you want to understand it, go read articles about it. All you need to know is lower equals (slightly) faster, but go too low and you'll lose stability. Also, increasing the voltage to your RAM can help increase stability for "tighter" (lower) timings, but every stick of RAM has its limits. Generally, you don't really need to be concerned with memory timings - I'd rather have 4 Gb of decent RAM over 2 Gb of great RAM any day of the week. So keep this rule of thumb for buying RAM - don't pay more (than like $10 or $20 more if you want slightly better Ram) for better memory timings, if the two pieces of RAM you're comparing are at the same speed. One other thing you should understand is that faster RAM speeds generally have slower/higher timings, and DDR2 has slower/higher timings than DDR, etc. etc. Therefore, DDR2 1066 has slower timings than DDR2 800, and so on and so forth.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[05:47 pm]
NimoStar -- If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface
[05:34 pm]
NimoStar -- Well. The bot didn't come up with any new strategy. It just has superhuman micro. Hard to beat that. I reckon even the simplest dedicated chess engines are unbeatable for humans now.
[02:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- all g
[10:54 am]
NudeRaider -- Oh_Man
Oh_Man shouted: NudeRaider did u watch the entire video? it's not one game. it's currently dominating the ladder at number 1 position. do ur research first!
Oops, caught me there, no I haven't. :( I was imagining how the game went. Sorry for that. Watching it now. brb
[10:52 am]
NudeRaider -- NimoStar
NimoStar shouted: They were not "Unprepared" that was their fifth loss in a row against the bot. The other replays are also available
that doesn't mean he was prepared. When humans come around with new strategies it often takes weeks until the pros figure out how to shut it down. Oh_Man that's certainly a way more convincing argument for micro being "too good to beat".
[09:43 am]
DiearAnother -- wirefram
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- Well, pros showed that long ago... half of zerg pros just ling muta rush
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- " its shown is that you can trade 1000's of apm to make up for lack of strategy"
[03:25 am]
Oh_Man -- https://youtu.be/R_6bsf9REkY anyone ever tried playing SC ghost?
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Symmetry