Staredit Network > Forums > Staredit Network > Topic: Faster Load Times
Faster Load Times
Mar 21 2014, 6:57 am
By: DT_Battlekruser  

Mar 21 2014, 6:57 am DT_Battlekruser Post #1



I've been bored and disappointed in pageload times, so I've been going around making little improvements. If any particular page or action seems to take longer than it should for a database with 500k - 1M entries, let me know and I'll see what I can do to speed up the queries. Thanks!



None.

Mar 21 2014, 8:35 am Sacrieur Post #2

Still Napping

Quote from DT_Battlekruser
I've been bored and disappointed in pageload times, so I've been going around making little improvements. If any particular page or action seems to take longer than it should for a database with 500k - 1M entries, let me know and I'll see what I can do to speed up the queries. Thanks!

:cube:



None.

Mar 21 2014, 11:32 am Moose Post #3

meme

I have no idea if having the Shoutbox disabled still makes the page load speed up tremendously, but if it does, that would be something to look. Most of my loadtimes are quick.




Mar 22 2014, 1:55 am DT_Battlekruser Post #4



I fixed the shoutbox problem like a year ago :P



None.

Mar 23 2014, 2:50 am iCCup.xboi209 Post #5



Try optimizing the front-end too! Look at how much data everyone can save just by enabling gzip
http://www.whatsmyip.org/http-compression-test/?url=c3RhcmVkaXQubmV0



None.

Mar 29 2014, 2:05 pm Moose Post #6

meme

I would also imagine that none of these can be bad starting points:

http://gtmetrix.com/
https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/
http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/




Mar 29 2014, 2:30 pm Devourer Post #7

Hello

Quote from Mini Moose 2707
I would also imagine that none of these can be bad starting points:

[...]
https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/
[...]
Interesting



Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.

Mar 29 2014, 8:47 pm DT_Battlekruser Post #8



I was mostly looking at backend optimization, which has been the problem in the past, but it does look like the biggest frontend thing to do would be to put up more cache settings on images. Still, since I indexed some things, I haven't had a page take longer than 1s to get back to me with output, and usually it's below 500 ms.



None.

May 3 2014, 4:04 am iCCup.xboi209 Post #9



Quote from iCCup.xboi209
Try optimizing the front-end too! Look at how much data everyone can save just by enabling gzip
http://www.whatsmyip.org/http-compression-test/?url=c3RhcmVkaXQubmV0
I was hoping someone would do this one day.....



None.

May 3 2014, 10:02 am DevliN Post #10

Woah

We're working on other things to fix load times at the moment. We're not ignoring that suggestion, it's just not high on our list as other pertinent fixes are taking precedence.



:devlin: Currently Working On: :devlin:
Myself

May 3 2014, 1:07 pm Moose Post #11

meme

GZIP compression was enabled via the method in PHP given in the link. It was selected over mod_deflate because it seemed quicker, easier, and harder to break than having PHP handle it. (Damn, it took about ten seconds to add in the one line, you other coders are scrubs. :P) Hopefully, SEN speeds up.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on May 3 2014, 2:02 pm by Mini Moose 2707.




Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin
[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr
[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.
[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.
[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.
[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Roy, O)FaRTy1billion[MM], RIVE