The toilet technology we're using now is pretty old iirc. :hellit'sabouttime: Canada is the worst water wasting country in the world. this should lower our consumption a bit. How will this get implemented? Will we have to update our plumping completely, or just stick the new toilet where the old one was? Also, SUPERTOILET!
it can be for both since they are far superior to any modern toilet today... sure there are some nice toilets out there but features from said hypothetical toilet can easily be moved over... e.g. self cleaning toilet seat, half flushes, motion sensor.
it can be for both since they are far superior to any modern toilet today... sure there are some nice toilets out there but features from said hypothetical toilet can easily be moved over... e.g. self cleaning toilet seat, half flushes, motion sensor.
Your local waste water treatment facilities do everything these "future toilets" claim to do plus more, except at a far more productive and economical level (i.e. churning out MGD's worth of waste as opposed to dinky gpd's per toilet - assuming they are used consistently). This isn't anything new, particularly to chemical and environmental engineers who work on this shit (no pun intended) every day.
Now a true "future toilet" would be one that doesn't fucking splash damage the fuck out of your fucking butt every fucking time you fucking drop a fucking bomb.
My post was aimed at those who'd think this would be much better than our current system. But I suppose Canada could use something like this if they're so concerned about being green
Your local waste water treatment facilities do everything these "future toilets" claim to do plus more, except at a far more productive and economical level (i.e. churning out MGD's worth of waste as opposed to dinky gpd's per toilet - assuming they are used consistently). This isn't anything new, particularly to chemical and environmental engineers who work on this shit (no pun intended) every day.
Now a true "future toilet" would be one that doesn't fucking splash damage the fuck out of your fucking butt every fucking time you fucking drop a fucking bomb.
We had these in soviet times. It had something like a shelf where to put down your brick. The shit only goes into water when you flush. Stinks like hell, but no splash damage.
Symmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr
[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.
[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.
Symmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
Symmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.
[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier