On the contrary, the review aspect is likely the only reason this thread wasn't closed on inspection. Posting videos with little to no discussion is better suited for the shoutbox.
@payne: It was interesting, but I didn't laugh. The Dear Sister version made me laugh when I first saw it, though that's probably just personal preference.
I liked the cat, the airplane and the dog one. The other ones weren't so good.
I don't know what's wrong with just posting videos, as long as they're actually good and not completely random crap, as is what usually gets posted in the shoutbox.
Probably some people have already seen this, but I still crack up every time.
I don't know what's wrong with just posting videos, as long as they're actually good and not completely random crap, as is what usually gets posted in the shoutbox.
I don't know what's wrong with just posting videos, as long as they're actually good and not completely random crap, as is what usually gets posted in the shoutbox.
The problem is this is a spam thread. If everyone is just posting video links with no purpose, then they might as well stick to posting them in the shoutbox as that would be more suitable. Typically the rule of thumb is that if a topic is made that is better suited in the shoutbox because no discussion will ensue, then it will be closed. I see this as being no different than when someone posts a link in the shoutbox and someone else says "LOL THAT WAS FUNNY" and then the link disappears in the sea of shouts.
I see this as being no different than when someone posts a link in the shoutbox and someone else says "LOL THAT WAS FUNNY" and then the link disappears in the sea of shouts.
Except there is a big difference, because if you're not in the shoutbox at the time the link is posted, you don't see it. Whereas when a link is posted here, anyone can come back days later and still see it.
Which I why I think we need to insist on good quality videos. I'd also hesitate to put a length limit in of 5-6 minutes, because there's no point putting in videos that no one is going to watch.
I see this as being no different than when someone posts a link in the shoutbox and someone else says "LOL THAT WAS FUNNY" and then the link disappears in the sea of shouts.
Except there is a big difference, because if you're not in the shoutbox at the time the link is posted, you don't see it. Whereas when a link is posted here, anyone can come back days later and still see it.
You can view past pages of the shoutbox and do that as well. I don't see how that makes it any more relevant, though, as half the videos in here are supposed to be funny or amusing (like the ones people post daily in the shoutbox). If one of them spawns a legitimate discussion, then it should have its own topic (i.e. http://www.staredit.net/topic/13592/ or http://www.staredit.net/topic/13654/ or http://www.staredit.net/topic/13368/ ).
We've always closed threads that were just meant for people to post random funny things like this when no discussion ensues. And frankly, "lol that video was good" isn't really discussion. Roy was absolutely right in saying that the "comment" idea of this thread was the only thing keeping it open, and even after that, some people still didn't seem to get it.
Actually forget it.
Closed.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on May 24 2011, 10:36 pm by DevliN.
ihjel shouted: "Use Display Text Message or the in-game Leaderboard to output the live values of critical Death Counters." that would be so convenient wouldn't it.
ihjel
ihjel shouted: "Use Display Text Message or the in-game Leaderboard to output the live values of critical Death Counters." that would be so convenient wouldn't it.
it's rather inconvenient actually, as it requires you to transfer it to Custom Score which might even interfere with what you're measuring. But IIRC you can also use EUDs to display it which by now could actually be somewhat convenient.
[2026-11-11. : 9:25 pm]
ihjel -- "Use Display Text Message or the in-game Leaderboard to output the live values of critical Death Counters." that would be so convenient wouldn't it.
[2026-11-11. : 6:59 pm]
Symmetry -- I just pasted what google ai told me to try to form a feedback loop
UndeadStar shouted: https://staredit.net/topic/18961/ <= wow, if there wasn't a capital letter on almost every word in the title, and a link in the signature, I may not have guesses it's an AI bot. I don't know much about map editing, but the content may even be relevant enough to be kept.
Yeah, I've noticed it, but it raised a couple of relevant questions and kept the ad to the signature so if someone were to engage with the topic it could be a net positive which is why I kept it. We're not necessarily anti-bot, just anti-spam. Thanks to Symmetry who realized my hope.