I tried "unit height" but at any given cliff level, their height = 0
And i don't want to place a region for every cliff i have in the map
None.
cliff validation
Is there any condition that checks what cliff level a unit is on?
I tried "unit height" but at any given cliff level, their height = 0
And i don't want to place a region for every cliff i have in the map
I tried "unit height" but at any given cliff level, their height = 0
And i don't want to place a region for every cliff i have in the map
>be faceless void >mfw I have no face
Depends on what you want it for. If it's for disabling something data related, you want to look into validators. I wish I could explain more but I don't know enough about them myself ;o
Red classic.
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."
An artist's depiction of an Extended Unit Death
I remember struggling with this, as well. Instead of getting the height of the unit, get the height of the point located at the position of the unit (Height At Point, where the point is Position Of Unit). "Height At Point" actually measures the terrain height at a specified area, rather than the height of some object. It's a bit finicky, but as long as you're using it for approximate heights, it should be fine.
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Apr 8 2011, 10:10 am by Roy.
Learn how EUDs work: A Mapmaker's Guide for Creating EUDs
Don't like learning?: EUDGen 2
Other stuff: Farlap Bound Maker
Dash: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
Jog: Original Warp
Other: Super Mario SC Fireball Guard Your Civilian Strength Contest
Don't like learning?: EUDGen 2
Other stuff: Farlap Bound Maker
Dash: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
Jog: Original Warp
Other: Super Mario SC Fireball Guard Your Civilian Strength Contest
Quote from 
Roy
RoyUnit height is a fixed height of the model of the unit, and will therefore not change if the unit is going up or down on the Z-axis.
I remember struggling with this, as well. Instead of getting the height of the unit, get the height of the point located at the position of the unit (Height At Point, where the point is Position Of Unit). "Height At Point" actually measures the terrain height at a specified area, rather than the height of some object. It's a bit finicky, but as long as you're using it for approximate heights, it should be fine.
I remember struggling with this, as well. Instead of getting the height of the unit, get the height of the point located at the position of the unit (Height At Point, where the point is Position Of Unit). "Height At Point" actually measures the terrain height at a specified area, rather than the height of some object. It's a bit finicky, but as long as you're using it for approximate heights, it should be fine.
Edit: Roy you're the man! "Height at Point" does the trick!
Now note that "height of Point" does not work so stay away from it!
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Apr 8 2011, 9:41 am by Roy. Reason: Try not to double-post
None.
An artist's depiction of an Extended Unit Death
Slight correction and clarification on what I said earlier about heights:
1. "Height Of Point" and "Height Of Unit" measure the distance between the point/unit and the ground. Ground units would have a height of 0, while air units would have a value greater than 0 for their height.
2. "Height Of Point" will always default to 0 for 2-dimensional points.
3. "Height At Point" measures the difference between (what I assume is) the default terrain height and the terrain at a specified point.
Post has been edited 3 time(s), last time on Apr 8 2011, 10:07 am by Roy.
1. "Height Of Point" and "Height Of Unit" measure the distance between the point/unit and the ground. Ground units would have a height of 0, while air units would have a value greater than 0 for their height.
2. "Height Of Point" will always default to 0 for 2-dimensional points.
3. "Height At Point" measures the difference between (what I assume is) the default terrain height and the terrain at a specified point.
Post has been edited 3 time(s), last time on Apr 8 2011, 10:07 am by Roy.
Learn how EUDs work: A Mapmaker's Guide for Creating EUDs
Don't like learning?: EUDGen 2
Other stuff: Farlap Bound Maker
Dash: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
Jog: Original Warp
Other: Super Mario SC Fireball Guard Your Civilian Strength Contest
Don't like learning?: EUDGen 2
Other stuff: Farlap Bound Maker
Dash: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 X
Jog: Original Warp
Other: Super Mario SC Fireball Guard Your Civilian Strength Contest
Options
Pages: 1
Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[06:02 pm]
Zoan -- of course it isn't full understanding. You could ask "is the mechanism by which this counterexample blows up the ONLY mechanism possible for an initial configuration to blow up?"[05:47 pm]
Zoan -- HeinermannHeinermann shouted: it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased
Constructing a counterexample is answering the question: "Is Navier Stokes well posed?" in the negative[05:43 pm]
Heinermann -- it also didn't solve that problem but hey as long as the investors are pleased[05:39 pm]
NudeRaider -- I have no idea tbh. All I know no human was ever able to solve it, but there's at least a few that beat portal 
[04:32 pm]
NudeRaider -- ZoanZoan shouted: I find it kind of sad that on the same day it was announced AI solved Navier Stokes, it was also announced AI beat Portal, and there's a good deal of people who don't know which is more impressive
you find it sad not everyone is a math nerd?
)