Since I can't find them I decided to do "http:blahblahblahviewpost=blah" (not sure if it¡s view post but you get it) and it doesn't seem to be working...
Fix please?
fuck you all
ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO
Will there be snapbacks? so I can just send them to somewhere else in the topic with a link.
Since I can't find them I decided to do "http:blahblahblahviewpost=blah" (not sure if it¡s view post but you get it) and it doesn't seem to be working...
Fix please?
Since I can't find them I decided to do "http:blahblahblahviewpost=blah" (not sure if it¡s view post but you get it) and it doesn't seem to be working...
Fix please?
ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO
What?
And what is that google link?
And what is that google link?
fuck you all
well if you just type the address of a site, it links to it
isn't that what you're asking? so you can just link to a post?
isn't that what you're asking? so you can just link to a post?
None.
ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO
No. I'm talking about old snapbacks and the viewpost.
I don't think you know what snapbacks are...
I don't think you know what snapbacks are...
fuck you all
The fact that they exist seems to point to IP planning to have snapbacks.
I assume that whatever code powers it isn't working right now (since it obviously isn't bookmark-driven).
I assume that whatever code powers it isn't working right now (since it obviously isn't bookmark-driven).
None.
ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO
What? There actually ARE snapbacks?
Where?
Where?
fuck you all
Click on the '7' is 'Post #7'. It provides a link to the post, but it currently doesn't actually end up doing anything.
None.
ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO
Yes, Which is exactly my point about viewpost not working.
However, snapbacks aren't even anywhere.
Tell me something I don't know please, DTBK?
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Sep 1 2007, 12:33 am by Corbo.
However, snapbacks aren't even anywhere.
Tell me something I don't know please, DTBK?
Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Sep 1 2007, 12:33 am by Corbo.
fuck you all
Snapbacks? i thought they were called anchors 
None.
ALL PRAISE YOUR SUPREME LORD CORBO
God, I got so much attention with this.
fuck you all
Options
Pages: 1
Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-6-26. : 10:31 am]
NudeRaider -- blessed innocent soul knows nothing of the strife we had before EUDs were discovered 
[2026-6-23. : 3:29 am]
DarkenedFantasies -- Probably just didn't care. For example, at some point before release, they've updated the graphics of some of the Protoss buildings (Forge, CyberCore, Citadel, Observatory, Arbiter Tribunal), but instead of properly re-rendering them with edited 3D models, they did crappy copy-paste jobs on the rendered graphics.
[2026-6-21. : 4:56 am]
Ultraviolet -- I suppose we'll likely never know, but my guess would be that they already saw it operating successfully and there was no monetary incentive to finish the original work. And the dev cycle in old school Blizzard was so hectic, it's possible it just got forgotten about after the original game got released. Plus there's an element of existing MPQ files that were packaged with the original discs becoming outdated if they updated it. And it's not like they remade the original MPQs, they just made new ones for BW specifically[2026-6-21. : 4:26 am]
Oh_Man -- so that makes me think maybe the theory they are unfinished is not true and its a deliberate design decision, coz why not finish them wen ur making brood war?[2026-6-21. : 4:25 am]
Oh_Man -- the thing is thos buildings are from classic. that means they went ahead and made brood war without ever finishing the 'unfinished' buildings