Staredit Network > Forums > Technology & Computers > Topic: Can't run SC2 on ultra settings...
Can't run SC2 on ultra settings...
Aug 7 2010, 8:48 pm
By: l3lack-l3ahamut  

Aug 7 2010, 8:48 pm l3lack-l3ahamut Post #1



I just purchased this laptop. It has a Geforce GT335M video card, an intel i5 and 4gb ddr3 ram. I can't figure out for the life of me why I am unable to run SC2 on ultra settings or at least on high settings. I've read numerous articles and posts about an alienware laptop with the same video card, which can run sc2 on ultra without a hiccup, however as soon as I select anything above medium I get lag... (such as you would see with someone playing a sc1 map on 56k).

I would appreciate any help or advice with this problem. It is really taking away from the game since everything looks like lego blocks.



None.

Aug 7 2010, 9:25 pm BiOAtK Post #2



Is the Alienware one overclocked or something?



None.

Aug 7 2010, 11:24 pm l3lack-l3ahamut Post #3



idk about the overclocking but I figured it out... apparently I have to go into my video card options and specify which video card I want certain programs to use...



None.

Aug 7 2010, 11:32 pm Vrael Post #4



Check out the specs of your graphics card. Look at the stats for the recommended graphics cards, Nvidia 8800GTX here: http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=88&pgno=7

And look at your GT335M specs here: http://www.techarp.com/showarticle.aspx?artno=98&pgno=7


Anything with the 'M' suffix means "mobile" and is much less powerful than the desktop version of the same thing.

So we're comparing 10,800MTexel+3600MPixel/sec on your 335M vs the recommended 36,800MTexel+13,800MPixel recommended settings.
128bit GDDR3 @ 800MHZ vs. 384bit GDDR3 @ 900 MHZ. Your card doesnt meet the recommended specs. Nvidia fucked you over. Even my old-ass 8800M beats your card,
16000MTexel+8000MPixel/sec, 256bit GDDR3 @ 800 MHZ.

I think thats the problem. I'd wait for someone like Ex to come along and tell me this is all completely wrong, but it looks right according to that site.

Edit: or it could be what you said? idk I like my explanation better. Your card beats the "minimum" Nvidia 6600, though. so maybe I'm wrong.



None.

Aug 7 2010, 11:40 pm Excalibur Post #5

The sword and the faith

A GT335M is not sufficient for SC2@Max and anyone that reports otherwise is a liar.




SEN Global Moderator and Resident Zealot
-------------------------
The sword and the faith.

:ex:
Sector 12
My stream, live PC building and tech discussion.

Aug 8 2010, 5:43 am rockz Post #6

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

The nvidia 300 series is a whole bunch of rebrands and proprietary bullshit which doesn't correctly correspond to its actual usefulness. Literally the only reason the 300 series exists is because OEM manufacturers wanted a next gen name to put in their laptops, since nvidia was so slow putting out fermi.

Make sure you turn off AA/AF and follow the forceware tweakguide.



"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

Aug 9 2010, 4:04 am l3lack-l3ahamut Post #7



Well I've concluded after a few tests, in order to run everything on ultra settings I am forced to keep my resolution at 1280x720, which doesn't bother me much. On the other hand I have to drop down between medium and high if I want to run at 1600x900 res.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin
[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]
Ultraviolet -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
fr fr
[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]
Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao
[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]
NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.
[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]
NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.
[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
not the map, the editor
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology
[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]
Symmetry -- Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself
[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]
NudeRaider -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous
yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.
[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]
Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: NudeRaider, Zycorax