Staredit Network > Forums > Technology & Computers > Topic: Wireless Sound-System
Wireless Sound-System
Aug 4 2010, 5:21 pm
By: Devourer  

Aug 4 2010, 5:21 pm Devourer Post #1

Hello

Hey community and hi ex :D
Just a general question, is a wireless sound-system worth it's price? Are there any disadvantages? Which is a good 5.1 (or better) you would recommend?



Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.

Aug 4 2010, 5:37 pm Excalibur Post #2

The sword and the faith

Wireless systems are extremely expensive and are not worth it unless you already have an amazing (100$ and up) soundcard and a high end receiver (which is even more expensive).

Edit: Just did the math, the soundcard / 5.1 wireless speakers / receiver combo I came up with was about 800$ after tax and shipping. Yeah, definitely not worth it.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Aug 4 2010, 5:43 pm by Excalibur.




SEN Global Moderator and Resident Zealot
-------------------------
The sword and the faith.

:ex:
Sector 12
My stream, live PC building and tech discussion.

Aug 4 2010, 8:04 pm NudeRaider Post #3

We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch

What's the difference between an average HD onboard soundchip and a good dedicated sound card?




Aug 4 2010, 8:20 pm Devourer Post #4

Hello

Ok, thanks, I agree :S



Please report errors in the Staredit.Network forum.

Aug 4 2010, 8:48 pm MadZombie Post #5



Whats the range on something like this? How far until the sound system is no longer able to pick anything up? Also on a semi-but-not-really-i-guess-lol-wuts-going-on note, what would be the range of a pair of headphones?



None.

Aug 5 2010, 12:32 am Excalibur Post #6

The sword and the faith

Quote from NudeRaider
What's the difference between an average HD onboard soundchip and a good dedicated sound card?
......The quality of the sound? Nude that's like HURR WHATS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PORSCHE AND A TOYOTA LOL




SEN Global Moderator and Resident Zealot
-------------------------
The sword and the faith.

:ex:
Sector 12
My stream, live PC building and tech discussion.

Aug 5 2010, 1:09 am NudeRaider Post #7

We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch

Quote from Excalibur
Quote from NudeRaider
What's the difference between an average HD onboard soundchip and a good dedicated sound card?
......The quality of the sound? Nude that's like HURR WHATS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A PORSCHE AND A TOYOTA LOL
Too unspecific. Do you mean noise? Do you mean frequency precision? Timings? Lack of "improvement" effects?
I'm asking because I'd argue that unless you're audiophile you wouldn't recognize any of the quality degradations mentioned above. So maybe you do know an aspect I didn't think of?

(you shouldn't assume I ask stupid questions, because usually I don't) ;)

Quote from MadZombie
Whats the range on something like this? How far until the sound system is no longer able to pick anything up? Also on a semi-but-not-really-i-guess-lol-wuts-going-on note, what would be the range of a pair of headphones?
Pretty much like WLAN. About 50 meters.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Aug 5 2010, 1:15 am by NudeRaider.




Aug 5 2010, 11:01 am Excalibur Post #8

The sword and the faith

The entire point of a high end soundcard and a receiver is to push high quality speakers to their maximum potential (Anything wireless is usually expensive both because it is wireless and because it is high quality). This is usually what an audiophile is looking for. A cheap wireless speaker setup, especially at 5.1 would be near impossible.




SEN Global Moderator and Resident Zealot
-------------------------
The sword and the faith.

:ex:
Sector 12
My stream, live PC building and tech discussion.

Aug 5 2010, 8:03 pm NudeRaider Post #9

We can't explain the universe, just describe it; and we don't know whether our theories are true, we just know they're not wrong. >Harald Lesch

Devo is definitely no audiophile. He just wanted to get rid of the cables.

I've talked to him and he dropped the idea because he'd still need cables to power the speakers which defeats the purpose of wireless for him.




Aug 5 2010, 11:55 pm rockz Post #10

ᴄʜᴇᴇsᴇ ɪᴛ!

Sound cards have actual hardware acceleration on them, usually in the form of some processor. Onboard usually uses the CPU to do this (which is software). The effect is noticeable in games like Oblivion when playing on a low (by current standards) end processor like my Athlon x2 4200+. Often times you will need to play:
background music x1
footsteps x10
attack sounds x10
battle cries x3
injuries x10
ambient sounds x2
As you can see, when fighting 10 enemies it gets pretty demanding pretty fast, such that a CPU handling all the visual data can't be bothered to handle the audio data. Workarounds include limiting the number of sounds that can be played, but that leads to attacks making no sound.

On top of the speed advantages, sound cards get to boast better audio quality, and probably pump out more power/better signal from the analog outputs. Most have digital and even optical now.

I'm going to get a sound card eventually when I have some disposable income from a salaried job, but the nice thing about sound cards nowadays is that they are all old tech, much like speakers and cases. If you buy one, you'll never have to buy another.

Post has been edited 1 time(s), last time on Aug 6 2010, 12:59 am by rockz.



"Parliamentary inquiry, Mr. Chairman - do we have to call the Gentleman a gentleman if he's not one?"

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[2026-10-11. : 6:02 am]
Donald -- Samase
[2026-10-09. : 2:53 am]
Mr.BurnLiquid -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: I'll check it out this weekend!
Thanks
[2026-10-09. : 2:47 am]
Symmetry -- I'll check it out this weekend!
[2026-10-09. : 2:40 am]
Mr.BurnLiquid -- Symmetry
Symmetry shouted: Another map maker? Damn we really ARE back
I invite you to try out the map I modified. I don't have the creativity to create maps from scratch, but I do have the know-how to modify existing ones; my project is to tweak community campaigns (specifically those with errors—to make them playable.
[2026-10-09. : 2:27 am]
Symmetry -- Another map maker? Damn we really ARE back
[2026-10-09. : 1:51 am]
Mr.BurnLiquid -- Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet shouted: Mr.BurnLiquid actually yeah though I wasn't really saying it to narc on you. It just caught me off guard because I don't usually see it (because it's against the rules) "The avatar may not be bigger than 150x150 pixels". Kinda silly that it relies on users to be well behaved rather than just limiting the dimensions on uploads :lol:
Now that I wanted to change my avatar, the error image is showing up, haha.
[2026-10-09. : 1:34 am]
Mr.BurnLiquid -- Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet shouted: Mr.BurnLiquid actually yeah though I wasn't really saying it to narc on you. It just caught me off guard because I don't usually see it (because it's against the rules) "The avatar may not be bigger than 150x150 pixels". Kinda silly that it relies on users to be well behaved rather than just limiting the dimensions on uploads :lol:
Mr.BurnLiquid
Mr.BurnLiquid shouted: Ultraviolet Thanks; I'm new to the site and a Spanish speaker. I must have missed the part where it was prohibited—I'll change it now.
I invite you to try out a mission I'm modifying from *StarCraft Reversed*; I'm trying to make it more playable and challenging.
[2026-10-09. : 1:33 am]
Mr.BurnLiquid -- Ultraviolet
Ultraviolet shouted: Mr.BurnLiquid actually yeah though I wasn't really saying it to narc on you. It just caught me off guard because I don't usually see it (because it's against the rules) "The avatar may not be bigger than 150x150 pixels". Kinda silly that it relies on users to be well behaved rather than just limiting the dimensions on uploads :lol:
Thanks; I'm new to the site and a Spanish speaker. I must have missed the part where it was prohibited—I'll change it now.
[2026-10-09. : 1:31 am]
Ultraviolet -- Mr.BurnLiquid
Mr.BurnLiquid shouted: Ultraviolet Is it forbidden to have a large avatar?
actually yeah though I wasn't really saying it to narc on you. It just caught me off guard because I don't usually see it (because it's against the rules) "The avatar may not be bigger than 150x150 pixels". Kinda silly that it relies on users to be well behaved rather than just limiting the dimensions on uploads :lol:
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Symmetry