Staredit Network > Forums > Technology & Computers > Topic: Office 2007 Issue?
Office 2007 Issue?
Jun 29 2010, 10:37 am
By: Fire_Kame  

Jun 29 2010, 10:37 am Fire_Kame Post #1

wth is starcraft

Hey, I'm writing a document in Office 2007 that contains one jpeg, and then quite a few charts and graphs. The first footer is different from the rest, because it is a disclaimer. As such, page numbers were set to start on "0" ... so my table of contents pages will start on 1 and it should in theory go on from there. Instead, what's happening is that it is numbering fine until page three, and then resets on page four at 0. then on page six it does it again, and at that point it numbers like it is supposed to until the end of the document.

So...what? Help?




Jun 29 2010, 6:00 pm poison_us Post #2

Master has given Dobby a doctorate! Dobby is free!

Uhm, just set the header & footer of page one to unique, then order the pages like a normal human?

EDIT:


Post has been edited 3 time(s), last time on Jun 29 2010, 6:12 pm by poison_us.




Jun 29 2010, 10:19 pm DavidJCobb Post #3



Use a section break.

Page 1 should have a different header and footer? Then put a section break at its end, and subsequent pages should then have different headers and footers. This can also be used to make different pages/sections/etc. have different settings regarding columns and other layout details.



None.

Jun 30 2010, 12:51 am Fire_Kame Post #4

wth is starcraft

Poison - The first page is different for the footer...they way you show is the only way I know how to do it. And what do you mean by "order pages like a normal human?" It is ordered as normal as you can get...the only difference is that I set it so that my cover page was considered '0' and table of contents considered '1' ... I don't know any normal-er way to do it.

David - can you tell me more about section breaks? That must be the problem. Here's a screen shot. Its a little blurry, but hopefully you can see my general settings at the top, and of course the Footer is denoted as Section 2 for the first time on this page, and resets numbering.






Jun 30 2010, 1:07 am DavidJCobb Post #5



IIRC it's Page Layout > Forget Which Group > Breaks [drop-down]. That drop-down is split into two chunks: Page Breaks and Section Breaks.



None.

Jun 30 2010, 3:19 am Fire_Kame Post #6

wth is starcraft

I fixed it. It had to do with the sections. Just in case anyone runs into the same problem, you can search for section breaks via find & replace by hitting Ctrl+H, clicking more, clicking special, and then selecting section breaks to delete them all.

What a pain. It looks like what happened was that I had section breaks in the way I had split up some of the data. Irritating.




Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[10:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- No APM in chess. Computer just outthinks the human by seeing more moves ahead and more permutations
[10:12 pm]
Oh_Man -- U reckon? Kasparov waa defeated by computer decades ago
[05:47 pm]
NimoStar -- If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface
[05:34 pm]
NimoStar -- Well. The bot didn't come up with any new strategy. It just has superhuman micro. Hard to beat that. I reckon even the simplest dedicated chess engines are unbeatable for humans now.
[02:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- all g
[10:54 am]
NudeRaider -- Oh_Man
Oh_Man shouted: NudeRaider did u watch the entire video? it's not one game. it's currently dominating the ladder at number 1 position. do ur research first!
Oops, caught me there, no I haven't. :( I was imagining how the game went. Sorry for that. Watching it now. brb
[10:52 am]
NudeRaider -- NimoStar
NimoStar shouted: They were not "Unprepared" that was their fifth loss in a row against the bot. The other replays are also available
that doesn't mean he was prepared. When humans come around with new strategies it often takes weeks until the pros figure out how to shut it down. Oh_Man that's certainly a way more convincing argument for micro being "too good to beat".
[09:43 am]
DiearAnother -- wirefram
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- Well, pros showed that long ago... half of zerg pros just ling muta rush
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- " its shown is that you can trade 1000's of apm to make up for lack of strategy"
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: Zoan, RIVE