Battle.net 2.0 (Topic)

Staredit Network > Forums > SC2 General Discussion > Topic: Battle.net 2.0

Battle.net 2.0

Jun 26 2010, 3:33 am
By: Ryu

Pages: < 1 2

Jul 27 2010, 8:15 pm

Dem0n Post #21

ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

...You just realized that?

Jul 27 2010, 11:35 pm grAffe Post #22

So what else is there? There's the ridiculous censorship of the map editor, no channels, no lan, no swearing... did i miss anything?

None.

Jul 27 2010, 11:46 pm

Dem0n Post #23

ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

You can turn off the mature language filter if you go into options. :-_-:

Jul 27 2010, 11:52 pm grAffe Post #24

Oh, but how exactly is the censorship of the map editor like?

None.

Jul 28 2010, 8:25 pm

Sand Wraith Post #25

she/her

How do you use a tool and be forced to give away the product with no profit? (EULA)

Jul 31 2010, 2:13 am Jesusfreak Post #26

Wait, so my real name is displayed to all people at all times?!? I thought it only showed it to people who I manually put on my "Real ID" friend's list...

None.

Jul 31 2010, 8:03 am

Vrael Post #27

I have one hope left: Patches.

How many SC1 patches were there? A billion. Maybe when like, 1/4 the expected number of sales blizz wanted happen, they'll wake up and be like "OH BUT WAIT WERE FIXING IT SORRY, ACTIVISION IS FUCKING OFF AND LETTING US DO OUR JOB"

None.

Jul 31 2010, 8:33 am

Sand Wraith Post #28

she/her

Quote from

Vrael

Maybe when like, 1/4 the expected number of sales blizz wanted happen, they'll wake up and be like "OH BUT WAIT WERE FIXING IT SORRY, ACTIVISION IS FUCKING OFF AND LETTING US DO OUR JOB"

This won't happen because every World of WhoreCraft player and Blizzard sucker is going to buy it too. Hell, I'm sure the majority of the SC2 players have never even bought SC1, let alone play it.

Options

Pages: < 1 2

Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.

Global Shoutbox

[2026-7-18. : 2:27 am]

Symmetry -- https://staredit.net/topic/18903/ THE REVIEWS ARE HERE! "ok these are pretty good memes" - ssj9Kevin

[2026-7-17. : 2:58 pm]

Ultraviolet -- Symmetry

Symmetry shouted: Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao

fr fr

[2026-7-17. : 2:39 am]

Symmetry -- Man I wish we had this tech back in the day when people played ums lmao

[2026-7-16. : 6:28 am]

NudeRaider -- EUD actions, specifically. The conditions remained. Today we can even have actions again, but they're all virtualized/whitelisted (not sure on the actual technical implementation) so you can only use them for specific intended purposed, not arbitrary code injections.

[2026-7-16. : 6:26 am]

NudeRaider -- I mean yes, maps - through EUDs - were theoretically able to do that as well, but that was patched quickly.

[2026-7-16. : 6:25 am]

NudeRaider -- Symmetry

Symmetry shouted: Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself

not the map, the editor

[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]

Symmetry -- I vaguely remember Voy doing some ACE back in the day, but I had no idea EUDs could do that kind of shit. I am very much catching up on the technology

[2026-7-16. : 2:28 am]

Symmetry -- Ohhh imagine a SC map that could delete itself

[2026-7-15. : 8:51 pm]

NudeRaider -- Symmetry

Symmetry shouted: NudeRaider Is EUD editor capable of writing shit onto the player's harddrive? That seems like it would be dangerous

yeah an editor that isn't allowed to write files sounds rather pointless, so I'd assume it can. Like most other programs too btw. and yes, obviously that's dangerous, but also kinda necessary. MS introduced that virtualization for exactly that reason.

[2026-7-15. : 4:10 am]

Ultraviolet -- I don't think so. I think they shut that shit down after 1.16, maybe even earlier

Please log in to shout.

Members Online:

l)ark_ssj9kevin