The thesis of this article is that the economic crisis started with the banks being unable to repay their loans, and massive government expenditures to save the entire system from collapsing put governments themselves in similar, debt-ridden situations which they might not be able to get out of. Greece, which is already requiring economic aid because it overspent, is essentially already screwed, and the government will need to greatly hike taxes and decrease social spending in all areas. The other PIIGS countries (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, Spain) are in similar situations, though not quite so dire yet; however, if Greece has to default on its debt, all the money loaned to it will simply disappear and that may cause similar situations in other countries that loaned to Greece. The article explains in some detail what Germany's situation is (It's a fantastic German newspaper), and how it has to save Greece because of the effect massive defaults can have on the world economy; how election year has forced Merkel to stall, portraying herself as one against rescuing those irresponsible Greeks. The article moves on to other countries, pointing out that most developed nations have been living far beyond their means while deficits and debts grew. Japan's economy is stagnating while its population is aging (which is bad); the US is 84% of it's GDP in debt, and rising; Britain is not quite so bad as the PIIGS, but the large debt and deficit are taking a toll on their economy, too. There are supposedly three ways out of a crisis for each country: Heavy taxation/lesser spending, firing up the printing presses (difficult in Europe, because of shared currency) to increase inflation and lower the value of money owed, or full or partial default.
It's a scary article, I think. It sounds fairly reasonable (admittedly, I'm not economist), and a worldwide crisis where no developed nation is able to repay their debts and the global economy crashes makes for... a rather poor environment to enter the workforce in.
What are your thoughts? Is it ridiculous fear-mongering? Do you agree with one aspect but not with another? What should be done?
Post has been edited 2 time(s), last time on May 7 2010, 3:39 am by Centreri.
None.




Meanwhile, the world is restructuring. A company restructures when they throw too many assets into a toxic project, a project that will not turn a profit from a long term, strategic point of view. For example, carriages. Ha, how that market has shrunk from necessity to luxury (ride around Central Park, anyone?). The company throws the project out and moves to something more profitable...gas drive cars. The world right now is still in the "gas driven cars" stage. We are throwing all of our resources into oil companies that are going to dry up in a long term strategic level. We are trying desperately to shift the market to electric, hybrid, hydrogen, solar, sugar cane etc cars, and we are coming up short. The world does not have the financial capacity to entirely shift markets. Even if a country did, would you go out tomorrow and buy a new car because it was affordable? My boyfriend has a 1997 civic, and I have a feeling I'm going to have to pry it from his cold, dead hands one day. The bottom line is that we are spiraling into recession, even as the market regains. All we are doing is perpetuating the problem: our world needs to move out of the current "market" and into greener pastures to make us all sustainable. 
