Staredit Network > Forums > SC2 Melee > Topic: Splitting workers
Splitting workers
Apr 28 2010, 8:24 am
By: Jack  

Apr 28 2010, 8:24 am Jack Post #1

>be faceless void >mfw I have no face

Is it worth manually splitting workers in SC2? Keep in mind I don't split them all that fast, as a pretty fail melee'r.



Red classic.

"In short, their absurdities are so extreme that it is painful even to quote them."

Apr 28 2010, 1:10 pm BeDazed Post #2



If you can divide them by 3s, its better that way. But manually dividing them one by one is not worth it in SC2.



None.

Apr 28 2010, 3:36 pm Forsaken Archer Post #3



I agree, it seems impossible and the workers float to other minerals fast enough by themselves. Splitting them into two groups to two separate mineral groups seems easiest and best.



None.

May 1 2010, 5:14 pm Vi3t-X Post #4



Send six to a mineral field and pick off three somewhere else.



None.

May 4 2010, 1:16 pm Syphon Post #5



Optimal splitting in SC2 is sending 3 groups of 2 to 3 different patches. I've only seen it done once.



None.

May 4 2010, 7:17 pm Kow Post #6



I've been experimenting with this lately and the best I've seen is to move all to the far mineral (on the edge or one away from the edge) and while they're in transit, select half and order them to a middle one.



None.

May 15 2010, 6:25 pm BeDazed Post #7



.. You should never send them to the furthest mineral. It's obvious you're starting at a disadvantage. If you're doing it simply because it's easier to select the other half, then you're going to be in loss when your level of play goes higher.



None.

May 16 2010, 1:25 pm Vi3t-X Post #8



Quote from Syphon
Optimal splitting in SC2 is sending 3 groups of 2 to 3 different patches. I've only seen it done once.
I can do it when the game lags at the start. :P



None.

May 17 2010, 1:27 am Valug Post #9



Quote from Syphon
Optimal splitting in SC2 is sending 3 groups of 2 to 3 different patches. I've only seen it done once.

I think optimal splitting is to send each worker to their own patch instantly.



None.

May 17 2010, 1:34 am Centreri Post #10

Relatively ancient and inactive

I think the difference is minimal, since from what I've seen SCII automatically splits two perfectly and sends them directly to their patches.



None.

May 17 2010, 10:42 am Aristocrat Post #11



I used to do 2 groups of 3 until I realized that sending in pairs worked better. After that I just sent 2-4 into 2-2-2. But really, it makes almost no difference.



None.

Options
  Back to forum
Please log in to reply to this topic or to report it.
Members in this topic: None.
[05:47 pm]
NimoStar -- If its any consolation, the human brain would still mop the floor with this bot if it wasn't limited by the mechanical interface
[05:34 pm]
NimoStar -- Well. The bot didn't come up with any new strategy. It just has superhuman micro. Hard to beat that. I reckon even the simplest dedicated chess engines are unbeatable for humans now.
[02:13 pm]
Oh_Man -- all g
[10:54 am]
NudeRaider -- Oh_Man
Oh_Man shouted: NudeRaider did u watch the entire video? it's not one game. it's currently dominating the ladder at number 1 position. do ur research first!
Oops, caught me there, no I haven't. :( I was imagining how the game went. Sorry for that. Watching it now. brb
[10:52 am]
NudeRaider -- NimoStar
NimoStar shouted: They were not "Unprepared" that was their fifth loss in a row against the bot. The other replays are also available
that doesn't mean he was prepared. When humans come around with new strategies it often takes weeks until the pros figure out how to shut it down. Oh_Man that's certainly a way more convincing argument for micro being "too good to beat".
[09:43 am]
DiearAnother -- wirefram
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- Well, pros showed that long ago... half of zerg pros just ling muta rush
[08:35 am]
NimoStar -- " its shown is that you can trade 1000's of apm to make up for lack of strategy"
[03:25 am]
Oh_Man -- https://youtu.be/R_6bsf9REkY anyone ever tried playing SC ghost?
Please log in to shout.


Members Online: MobMob